From: Marc Schmitt Subject: Re: nfsd and kswapd Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 13:19:39 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <40C44F4B.9090307@inf.ethz.ch> References: <004c01c44c78$5f789120$0200000a@CARTMAN> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BXGpv-0008Mc-L4 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 02:54:35 -0700 Received: from xsmtp.ethz.ch ([129.132.97.6]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BXGpv-00020X-71 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 02:54:35 -0700 To: Amir Hermelin In-Reply-To: <004c01c44c78$5f789120$0200000a@CARTMAN> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Hi Amir, Amir Hermelin wrote: >Thanks Marc for the info. It so happens I'm also using a PowerEdge (2600), >so I'll check out that thread. I'm using a RH 9 system, kernel 2.4.20-8 - >should that include the better mem management you've mentioned? > > Yes, but 2.4.20-8 is very old and does not have the kswapd fix. Try upgrading to 2.4.20-31 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-166.html), it should make a difference. Greetings, Marc ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.