From: raven@themaw.net Subject: Re: async vs. sync Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:56:38 +0800 (WST) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435E51E@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> <200407270006.08581.bernd-schubert@web.de> <410643C5.3040004@bruvoll.com> <200407271500.38074.bernd-schubert@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jan Bruvoll , NFS mailling list Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BpSSv-0006Dl-Jy for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:58:01 -0700 Received: from wombat.indigo.net.au ([202.0.185.19]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BpSSu-00010X-TS for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:58:01 -0700 To: Bernd Schubert In-Reply-To: <200407271500.38074.bernd-schubert@web.de> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > >>My set-up has about the same performance data, however my big problem is > > >>that the server dies when I hook all my clients up... Raw throughput > > > > > >Fortunately that doesn't seem to happen in our case. > > > > Let me clarify - the server doesn't quite die, however it slows down > > drastically, having a load of ~7 while 99% CPU idle. The clients clog > > up, and for instance trying to mount anything just times out. If I > > unmount the busy share from the clients, everything settles down again. > > We noticed a higher load with sync-mounts, usually we have 0-2, with 2.4. and > sync-mounts it went until 3-4. But we also only used sync mounts for less > than 24, so changed to async mounts as soon as the people complained. > > [snip] > > > > > I tried a little more performance number hunting: > > - NFS copy and write to same device - 3Mb/s sustained (500Mb file) > > - piozone direct write to RAID device - ~34-50Mb/s (depending on file > > size) - drbd network device - 933Mb/s > > > > Nothing really wrong here I'd say - not blazingly quick, but surely > > nothing to explain why everything just stops when I hook up my 12 > > clients to this set-up? > > Certainly not. We have 45 diskless booting clients. How many threads is the server running? Ian ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs