From: Bruce Allan Subject: > 16 groups patch from Frank van Maarseveen Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:14:40 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1091207680.4797.47.camel@dyn319648.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: nfs@lists.sf.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BqayE-0002HY-OO for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:15:02 -0700 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BqayE-0006Qt-BH for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:15:02 -0700 To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Hi Trond, I was wondering why Frank's patch to bypass the 16 group limitation in RPC (http://frankvm.xs4all.nl/nfs-ngroups/) has not been incorporated into mainline yet. Is it because he has not addressed your concern/recommendation as mentioned in http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-nfs&m=87941837304355&w=2 If the patch were modified to follow your recommendation in the same post, would that be acceptable? Thanks much, --- Bruce Allan Software Engineer, Linux Technology Center IBM Corporation, Beaverton OR 503-578-4187 IBM Tie-line 775-4187 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs