From: Bernd Schubert Subject: client: 2.6.7 client much slower than 2.4.26 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 23:18:12 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <200407012318.18934.bernd-schubert@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_a+H5ACB/RGgQj5D"; charset="iso-8859-1" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Bg8wx-0007c0-17 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:18:31 -0700 Received: from smtp06.web.de ([217.72.192.224]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bg8ww-0006ve-CM for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:18:30 -0700 Received: from [80.140.1.156] (helo=bathl.lan.fli4l) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (WEB.DE 4.101 #38) id 1Bg8wm-0008BS-00 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:18:20 +0200 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: --Boundary-02=_a+H5ACB/RGgQj5D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I'm currently testing 2.6.7 on one of our clients and the nfs transfer is m= uch=20 slower than when the same system is running 2.4.X Well, the usual suggestion probably would be to run nfs over tcp now, but t= cp=20 is already enabled (from /proc/mounts): taylor:/worka /mnt/test nfs=20 rw,v3,rsize=3D32768,wsize=3D32768,hard,tcp,lock,addr=3Dtaylor 0 0 benchmarks: copy a file to the server (2.6.7): ~ 3MB/s copy a file to the server (2.4.26): ~ 9MB/s copy a file from the server (2.6.7): ~ 3MB/s copy a file from the server (2.4.26): ~ 11MB/s The filesize was 300MB. Here's the nfsstat output: euklid:~# nfsstat Client rpc stats: calls retrans authrefrsh 385466 0 0 Client nfs v2: null getattr setattr root lookup readlink 0 0% 27475 66% 231 0% 0 0% 3963 9% 161 0% read wrcache write create remove rename 8303 20% 0 0% 560 1% 171 0% 198 0% 42 0% link symlink mkdir rmdir readdir fsstat 45 0% 0 0% 3 0% 3 0% 129 0% 2 0% Client nfs v3: null getattr setattr lookup access readlink 0 0% 56851 16% 1047 0% 17711 5% 36670 10% 936 0% read write create mkdir symlink mknod 73640 21% 149802 43% 629 0% 86 0% 1 0% 0 0% remove rmdir rename link readdir readdirplus 701 0% 105 0% 279 0% 36 0% 464 0% 1557 0% fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit 260 0% 18 0% 0 0% 3387 0% I already tried to reduce rsize and wsize up to 1024, but this didn't chang= e=20 anything. This happens to two different servers, one server is running 2.6.7 and has= =20 Gigabit connection to the switch. The other server is running 2.4.25 and on= ly=20 has a 100MBit connection. All of our clients have 100MBit connections. So I really thing this is a client problem. Well, the client is not the=20 fastest of our systems (PII 450), but with 2.4.X it has the usual speed. It= s=20 also interesting top is showing that the rpciod is taking all cpu-time when= =20 copying a file to the server. Any ideas whats going on? Thanks, Bernd --Boundary-02=_a+H5ACB/RGgQj5D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBA5H+aC8BUnAF+ydYRAik5AJ9VU8s2+5a4hM0Di5cNVLhjLm5YWQCeM042 78zKqd1Rge2EBPRbfGmLV98= =pxVw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_a+H5ACB/RGgQj5D-- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs