From: "Lever, Charles" Subject: NFS FAQ updates Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:36:32 -0700 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435E71F@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1C27sU-0003hK-1T for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:36:46 -0700 Received: from mx01.netapp.com ([198.95.226.53]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C27sS-0004X7-Gn for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:36:45 -0700 Received: from hawk.corp.netapp.com (hawk [10.57.156.122]) by mx01.netapp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/NTAP-1.4) with ESMTP id i7VCaXFC009007 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from svlexc01.hq.netapp.com (svlexc01.corp.netapp.com [10.57.156.135]) by hawk.corp.netapp.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/NTAP-1.5) with ESMTP id i7VCaXHv010418 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:36:33 -0700 (PDT) To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: hi - i'm considering a series of updates to the FAQ, including adding more information about NFSv4 and NFS with Kerberos, and removing the 2.2 specific information in the document. removing the 2.2 items seems possibly controversial, so let me ask here: does that seem like a reasonable thing to do now? - Chuck Lever -- corporate: personal: ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs