From: Frank Steiner Subject: Re: Performance udp vs. tcp Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 12:39:30 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <4129C962.10305@bio.ifi.lmu.de> References: <4129BF94.20902@bio.ifi.lmu.de> <20040823103637.GK10775@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BzCEg-0001V1-Ai for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 03:39:34 -0700 Received: from acheron.informatik.uni-muenchen.de ([129.187.214.135]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BzCEe-00021o-Pb for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 03:39:34 -0700 To: Greg Banks In-Reply-To: <20040823103637.GK10775@sgi.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Greg Banks wrote: > There's nothing unusual here. On a low-latency uncongested unlossy > network, it's not surprising that UDP is faster. As soon as any > of those factors goes away, TCP starts winning. Ok, thanks! I just wasn't sure about that. -- Dipl.-Inform. Frank Steiner Web: http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/~steiner/ Lehrstuhl f. Bioinformatik Mail: http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/~steiner/m/ LMU, Amalienstr. 17 Phone: +49 89 2180-4049 80333 Muenchen, Germany Fax: +49 89 2180-99-4049 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs