From: Peter Astrand Subject: NFSv3 ACL status? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:01:39 +0200 (CEST) Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Bv9aq-0001XL-Jv for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:01:44 -0700 Received: from cheddar.cendio.se ([193.12.253.77] helo=mail.cendio.se) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bv9aq-00049F-5o for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:01:44 -0700 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Can someone give an quick overview of the Linux NFSv3 ACL status? The Linux NFS FAQ at http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ says: "D3. What does this mean: svc: unknown program 100227 (me 100003) A. It refers to a mount request by a Solaris system that is trying to get ACL information - which linux obviously does not have. " But: http://acl.bestbits.at/ seems to indicate that ACLs over NFSv3 actually works, and provides patches for 2.6.1, but I can't find any information about if this patch is really needed for modern kernels (2.6.7) or modern distributions. Is this patch for the server, client or both? Also, what about interoperatbility with Solaris? /Peter ?strand ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs