From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH / RFC] nfs-utils: High Availability NFS Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:56:49 +1000 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <16693.4161.921397.480506@cse.unsw.edu.au> References: <4124DB86.9060505@steeleye.com> <16677.22269.988036.787320@cse.unsw.edu.au> <412E1C10.5020703@steeleye.com> <16692.8187.411591.69640@cse.unsw.edu.au> <4134A6AD.1060502@steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1C2IUo-0008Qa-2t for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:57:02 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.edu.au ([129.94.242.24] ident=root) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2IUl-0002Xf-Ap for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:56:59 -0700 To: Paul Clements In-Reply-To: message from Paul Clements on Tuesday August 31 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Tuesday August 31, paul.clements@steeleye.com wrote: > > New patch attached. > Thanks. I'm almost ready to commit it. I added a bit to the documentation to describe the arguments passed to the callout. For mountd +). +The program will be called with 4 arguments. +The first will be +.B mount +or +.B umount +depending on the reason for the callout. +The second will be the name of the client performing the mount. +The third will be the path that the client is mounting. +The last is the number of concurrent mounts that we believe the client +has of that path. For statd +The program will be run with 3 arguments: The first is either +.B add-client +or +.B del-client +depending on the reason for the callout. +The second will be the name of the client. +The third will be .... +.TP Note that for statd, I dropped the third arg being passed. It seemed easier than explaining in the doco why there is a fourth arg. Also note that I don't remember what "my_name" is all about. Could you provide a small piece of text to go there. Finally, would you consider having "unmount" instead of "umount" as a possible first arg for the mountd callout? Thanks NeilBrown ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs