From: Greg Banks Subject: Re: NFS FAQ updates Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:24:56 +1000 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20040901002456.GL5745@sgi.com> References: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435E71F@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1C2Ivu-0004gA-14 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:25:02 -0700 Received: from omx3-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.20] helo=omx3.sgi.com) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2Ivt-0003Xy-L6 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:25:01 -0700 To: "Lever, Charles" In-Reply-To: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435E71F@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 05:36:32AM -0700, Lever, Charles wrote: > hi - > > i'm considering a series of updates to the FAQ, including adding more > information about NFSv4 and NFS with Kerberos, and removing the 2.2 > specific information in the document. > > removing the 2.2 items seems possibly controversial, so let me ask here: > does that seem like a reasonable thing to do now? I'd vote: yes. Greg. -- Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. I don't speak for SGI. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs