From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH / RFC] nfs-utils: High Availability NFS Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:17:34 +1000 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <16699.51390.633644.1498@cse.unsw.edu.au> References: <4124DB86.9060505@steeleye.com> <16677.22269.988036.787320@cse.unsw.edu.au> <412E1C10.5020703@steeleye.com> <16692.8187.411591.69640@cse.unsw.edu.au> <4134A6AD.1060502@steeleye.com> <16693.4161.921397.480506@cse.unsw.edu.au> <413546B1.4080306@steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1C494k-00075z-7g for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 19:17:46 -0700 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.edu.au ([129.94.242.24] ident=root) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C494j-0000FO-7e for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 19:17:45 -0700 To: Paul Clements In-Reply-To: message from Paul Clements on Tuesday August 31 Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Tuesday August 31, paul.clements@steeleye.com wrote: > Neil Brown wrote: > > On Tuesday August 31, paul.clements@steeleye.com wrote: > > > I added a bit to the documentation to describe the arguments passed to > > the callout. > > Those look good to me. > > > > Note that for statd, I dropped the third arg being passed. It seemed > > easier than explaining in the doco why there is a fourth arg. > > Also note that I don't remember what "my_name" is all about. Could > > you provide a small piece of text to go there. > > The my_name argument is the server name, but honestly, I don't know that > we need anything other than the client name (we really just need to know > what files to create in the sm/sm.bak directories) so if you want to > just drop that argument it's fine with me. > > > > Finally, would you consider having "unmount" instead of "umount" as a > > possible first arg for the mountd callout? > > unmount instead of umount is fine if you want to go ahead and make that > change... > > Thanks, > Paul Ok, I have made these changes, committed them, and tags them with nfs-utils-1-0-6-post3. I'm not sure if I mentioned, but I change the SIGHUP handling so that instead of doing the work in the signal handler, I set a flag and do the work in the main look (svc_run). This avoids some races. NeilBrown ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs