From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix nfsidem cthon test Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:40:18 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1098344418.28394.17.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <1098341478.21421.7.camel@hole.melbourne.sgi.com> <1098343891.28394.15.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1098345111.21421.9.camel@hole.melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CKXYu-00078V-Nr for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:40:40 -0700 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CKXYu-00071r-3J for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:40:40 -0700 To: Greg Banks In-Reply-To: <1098345111.21421.9.camel@hole.melbourne.sgi.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: to den 21.10.2004 Klokka 17:51 (+1000) skreiv Greg Banks: > > > > Vetoed. > > I don't get it. Why is this patch in 2.4? It slipped in. That's not a reason to make the same mistake in 2.6. Cheers, Trond -- Trond Myklebust ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs