From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] Re: [PATCH] NFS using CacheFS
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:02:34 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <5324.1097226154@redhat.com>
References: <41661950.5070508@tequila.co.jp>  <4161B664.70109@RedHat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel=40m.gmane.org-S268153AbUJHJCx@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <41661950.5070508@tequila.co.jp> 
To: Linux filesystem caching discussion list
	<linux-cachefs@redhat.com>
List-ID: <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>


> brr :) why is it posix, this is so out of the context for me (as a
> user). Is it possible to have a cachefs flag. Would make it more logical.

It's a prototype, so Steve's made use of an existing flag for convenience
sake.

David