From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@duke.edu>
Subject: Re: async vs. sync
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:57:35 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411221653180.5313@chaos.egr.duke.edu>
References: <20041122214605.8E2B31D0FE1@sc8-sf-uberspam1.sourceforge.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <20041122214605.8E2B31D0FE1@sc8-sf-uberspam1.sourceforge.net>
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 1:45pm, jehan.procaccia@int-evry.fr wrote

> Anyone is getting the same performance as me in server sync mode ?, if 
> someone could just tar xvfz any recent httpd.tar.gz file (nearly 3000 
> source files) and let me know how it take on their nfs configuration ?

Server: RH7.3, sync export
Client: Centos 3.3 (RHEL 3 U3 rebuild), async mount, UDP, 8K r/wsize

[jlb@chaos tmp]$ time tar xzf ~/tmp/httpd-2.0.52.tar.gz 

real    0m25.522s
user    0m0.520s
sys     0m0.560s

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs