From: Michael Haverkamp Subject: Re: Stale NFS Filehandles and Permission Denied on 2.6.9 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:06:00 -0600 Message-ID: <41A343C8.7090106@kcp.com> References: <41A28FE0.9070906@affymetrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CWbJ7-0006JI-09 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:06:13 -0800 Received: from mailhost2.os.kcp.com ([198.124.201.32]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CWbJ5-0005Zq-37 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:06:12 -0800 To: Hugh Caley , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <41A28FE0.9070906@affymetrix.com> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: I had similar problems. Downgrading to kernel 2.6.7 and using no_subtree_check seemed to fix it for me. I'm not sure which one fixed it, or if it was both. Hugh Caley wrote: > We recently migrated our main storage to a Nexsan Atabeast fronted by > two PC's running Fedora Core 2. We are being plagued by "Stale NFS > Filehandle" and "Permission Denied" errors on machines mounting the > shares provided by the two PC's. Very sporadic, but annoying. > > I can't seem to find any rhyme or reason for this. Clients that have > seen the problem include a machine running RH 7.3 accessing a mount in > fstab, to a Fedora Core 1 client automounting a share. Many times just > running 'ls' on the share a few times will suddenly make it accessable. > Other times a umount/mount is required. > > The server machines are running Fedora Core 2 and kernel > 2.6.9-1.3_FC2smp. The exported filesystems are ReiserFS on LVM2 > volumes. Qlogic QLA2300 fibre adaptors connect the heads to the Nexsan > Atabeast. > > After reading some traffic on the Linux kernel list, I added the > "no_subtree_check" option to the fstab entries on the servers and > re-exported. It doesn't seem to have made much of a difference. > > I'm not seeing error messages in /var/log/messages on either the clients > nor the hosts. > > Anyone else seeing this? Any ideas? Otherwise the performance on the > new systems beats the hell out of our old EMC Celerra; the users are > rather happy with it save for this little problem. > > Hugh > -- Michael Haverkamp ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs