From: Dan Stromberg Subject: RE: async vs. sync Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:16:42 -0800 Message-ID: <1101233801.13960.14.camel@soot.ess.uci.edu> References: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435EBDF@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-sQbNJQkQHRcZIWQ/ptJm" Cc: strombrg@dcs.nac.uci.edu, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CWfDb-0002cT-2i for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:16:47 -0800 Received: from dcs.nac.uci.edu ([128.200.34.32] ident=root) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1CWfDY-0007Qp-BM for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:16:46 -0800 To: "Lever, Charles" In-Reply-To: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435EBDF@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: --=-sQbNJQkQHRcZIWQ/ptJm Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 08:36, Lever, Charles wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 19:53, Lever, Charles wrote: > > > > > not to mention "soft" mounts are also truly the spawn of satan. > > > >=20 > > > > Unless your filesystem is also readonly... > > >=20 > > > unfortunately that is a myth. even a readonly file system can fall=20 > > > victim to the evils of soft mounts, i'm told. > >=20 > > Ummmm... How? > >=20 > > About all that can happen, is you lose the mount. You pretty much > > -can't- toast any data. > >=20 > > > the cached version of the file on the client can become=20 > > corrupted if=20 > > > the file is changing remotely and one or more cache-refresh reads=20 > > > times out. > >=20 > > In which case it wasn't truly read only.... >=20 > let's be precise. >=20 > there is only one case where a soft mount won't cause data corruption. > that is when the local file system on the server is mounted read only > and exported read only, and the client mounts the NFS export read only. >=20 > maybe good for sharing CD-ROMs via NFS, but otherwise not terribly > useful. Yes, that's nice and precise. :) We used to have a filesystem that contained netboot info (ethers, bootptab, bootparams, tftp), mounted soft on a bunch of hosts. We never had a problem with it, other than it disappearing when the NFS server would go down for a while. The data changed very infrequently, so we were fine. --=-sQbNJQkQHRcZIWQ/ptJm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBo36Jo0feVm00f/8RAjSZAJ9QK6XmDlsfGpKpMMgKoKPhq5hFlwCfafpT jP8LUsD9zX0uwqEZMT3yk1g= =woJ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-sQbNJQkQHRcZIWQ/ptJm-- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs