From: "Lever, Charles" Subject: RE: async vs. sync Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:45:22 -0800 Message-ID: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435EB6D@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CU8Kf-0008Ck-3F for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:45:37 -0800 Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CU8Ke-0005We-IB for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:45:36 -0800 To: "jehan.procaccia" Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: > Is it really dangerous to use async ? why recent OS uses sync=20 > by default (My client is a Fedora Core 2 (kernel 2.6) and > server an RedHat Entreprise server 3 (kernel 2.4)) see the NFS FAQ: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ questions B4 and B5, at least. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs