From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [patch] lockd control of grace period for HA NFS Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:04:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20041206150428.GC20864@fieldses.org> References: <16802.32693.974799.504191@cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Neil Brown , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CbKPh-0005Rn-Hr for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 07:04:33 -0800 Received: from dsl093-002-214.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.2.214] helo=pickle.fieldses.org) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.41) id 1CbKPf-0000Kw-Rb for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 07:04:32 -0800 To: Marc Eshel In-Reply-To: Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 07:38:34PM -0800, Marc Eshel wrote: > 'echo 1 > /porc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_grace' will put lockd in grace period and > 'echo 0 > /porc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_grace' will take it out of grace period but > it is not necessary to 'echo 0' since it will just come out of grace period > when the period ends. The "echo 0" is a little dangerous, isn't it? Do we really need the ability to end the grace period prematurely?--b. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs