From: Steve Dickson Subject: Re: ACL patch - is this bad or good? Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 14:24:10 -0500 Message-ID: <41B4B1DA.1040406@RedHat.com> References: <20041204222659.GA5837@perlsupport.com> <16819.43070.634276.944461@cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: Chip Salzenberg , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CbOQk-0007WE-Rf for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:21:54 -0800 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1CbOQi-00076Z-Dp for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:21:54 -0800 To: Neil Brown In-Reply-To: <16819.43070.634276.944461@cse.unsw.edu.au> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Neil Brown wrote: >So I am OK with this patch going in to nfs-utils, providing the man >page make it clear that not all kernels support this functionality, >and will quietly accept but ignore the flag. > >Anyone want to re-make the patch with a suitable change to the >manpage? > > I'll add it to my todo list.... steved. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs