From: Calum Mackay Subject: Re: [patch] lockd control of grace period for HA NFS Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:17:46 +0000 Message-ID: <41ADFCBA.6040605@sun.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "William A.(Andy) Adamson" , Neil Brown , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net, Trond Myklebust Return-path: To: Marc Eshel In-Reply-To: Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Hi Marc, Andy, Forgive my late joining of this thread, and apologies if I'm missing anything... How do you intend to handle the stable storage issue? It seems to me that to comply with the RFC's requirement that stable storage be used when a grace period is offered, there needs to be a Cluster-wide, always-consistent, stable-storage, available to all nodes. I imagine that a correct implementation of this isn't a trivial exercise... :) best regards, calum. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs