From: Frank van Maarseveen Subject: EJUKEBOX and nfs3_proc_read()/nfs3_proc_write() Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:59:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20050127225911.GA24398@janus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CuIeW-0008RQ-QL for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:02:16 -0800 Received: from frankvm.xs4all.nl ([80.126.170.174] helo=janus.localdomain) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CuIbg-0006Ss-9w for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:02:16 -0800 To: Trond Myklebust Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: I think that the EJUKEBOX wrapper in fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c is not necessary for nfs3_proc_read() and nfs3_proc_write(). Can you confirm this? I want to simplify these particular cases while working on a redesigned patchset for >16 groups support. Part of it are a number of cleanup patches and they would be smaller when EJUKEBOX handling can be omitted in these two functions. -- Frank ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs