From: "Ara.T.Howard" Subject: RE: debugging failed lock recovery Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:27:25 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: References: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130853969F@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Reply-To: "Ara.T.Howard" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cud8d-0005GS-94 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:54:43 -0800 Received: from externalmx-1.sourceforge.net ([12.152.184.25]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1Cud86-0007MR-MQ for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:54:43 -0800 Received: from harp.ngdc.noaa.gov ([140.172.178.33]) by externalmx-1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1CuZuH-0006zK-0P for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:27:41 -0800 To: "Lever, Charles" In-Reply-To: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130853969F@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Lever, Charles wrote: > ara- > > the client must have a fully qualified nodename (uname -n) which matches > the result of a DNS lookup, in order for lock recovery to work. > > the nodename is set in /etc/sysconfig/networking on red hat systems. charles- thanks for the lead! yes. they all have that and they are in dns. however, our nfs runs on the 'backdoor': each client/server has two cards, one mated to client.domain and one to client.b.domain both are in dns. *however* the output of uname -n is (of course) the frontdoor. so it seems we have a mismatch. so uname -n *might* match the result of a dns lookup depending on which interface is looked up and, i'm guessing, this will be the backdoor interface and therefore fail. anyone have ideas on what to do about this? can nfs be run on a multihomed server on an interface NOT named the same as 'uname -n'?? kind regards. -a -- =============================================================================== | EMAIL :: Ara [dot] T [dot] Howard [at] noaa [dot] gov | PHONE :: 303.497.6469 | When you do something, you should burn yourself completely, like a good | bonfire, leaving no trace of yourself. --Shunryu Suzuki =============================================================================== ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs