From: mehta kiran <kiranmehta1981@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: lockd grace period
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:01:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20050131150157.83316.qmail@web51606.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <41FE4796.9060909@RedHat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: mehta kiran <kiranmehta1981@yahoo.com>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Return-path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net)
	by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1Cvd43-000216-WD
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:02:07 -0800
Received: from web51606.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.211])
	by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1Cvd42-00038L-Hd
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:02:08 -0800
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>,
	"Aswathanarayana, Chetan (STSD)" <chetan.aswathanarayana@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <41FE4796.9060909@RedHat.com>
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=nfs>

Hi , 
         but can u please let me know whether
 lockd which has been running before nfsd started
will enter grace period  or not
and will only server reclaim request ot not
thanks ,
 kiran
--- Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com> wrote:

> Aswathanarayana, Chetan (STSD) wrote:
> 
> >Say, a reclaim request arrives after grace period
> and get's lock. There
> >will be time frame between end of grace period and
> arrival of
> >Reclaim request, in which case any thing can
> happen(ex: a new request
> >could be granted, it may make some changes to a
> file and unlock by the
> >time Reclaim arrives).
> >  
> >
> Nobody  is saying this NLM protocol or method of
> recovery is perfect.... 
> ;-)  This
> is one of many reasons why the locking protocol is
> not integrated with the
> NFSv4 protocol...
> 
> steved.
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs