From: Haakon Riiser Subject: Random UDP port assignment for rpc.statd Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:13:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20050220111312.GA3974@s> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1D2p1j-0006zx-R3 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 03:13:27 -0800 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1D2p1i-0004Bz-9A for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 03:13:27 -0800 Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44] ident=[U2FsdGVkX1+N8TnNm6Bpg5CWjVW1xKZS4LKQY0RuoOo=]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D2p1b-00065w-N2 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:13:19 +0100 Received: from 160.80-203-48.nextgentel.com ([80.203.48.160] helo=s.hn.org) by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1D2p1a-0000Zp-9F for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:13:18 +0100 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Why isn't it possible to specify all of statd's listening ports using the -p flag? It works for the TCP port and one of the UDP ports, but there is always one more listening UDP port that is randomly assigned. I googled around for information on this problem, and came up with this Debian bug report: http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg11985.html The thread ends with "I think we may have a real bug", but this was reported in 1.0.6, and the problem still persists in 1.0.7, so I was wondering if this isn't a bug after all. Btw, there's also a similar problem with nfsd: In addition to the standard listening port at 2049, it always opens a random port in the high port range (32000-32768 or something like that). In case it matters: I'm using Linux 2.6.10 and Slackware 10.1. -- Haakon ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs