From: Dan Stromberg Subject: Re: FC3 <-> Solaris 10, NFSv4 interop? Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:16:03 -0800 Message-ID: <1109376963.30943.7.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> References: <1109296629.5897.574.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> <200502251706.24315.vincent.roqueta@ext.bull.net> <1109355225.5897.580.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> <20050225184615.GD23369@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-i0ZGxBw9q0t2wuLhlIkP" Cc: strombrg@dcs.nac.uci.edu, Vincent Roqueta , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1D4pd3-00058H-LO for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:16:17 -0800 Received: from dcs.nac.uci.edu ([128.200.34.32] ident=root) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1D4pd1-00040t-7Q for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:16:17 -0800 To: "J. Bruce Fields" In-Reply-To: <20050225184615.GD23369@fieldses.org> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: --=-i0ZGxBw9q0t2wuLhlIkP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 13:46 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:13:45AM -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 17:06 +0100, Vincent Roqueta wrote: > > > Le vendredi 25 F=E9vrier 2005 02:57, Dan Stromberg a =E9crit : > > > > Has anyone got NFSv4 working from an FC3 NFS server to a Solaris 10= NFS > > > > client? > > > > > > > > foobar-root /) mount seki.nac.uci.edu:/sdb1 /mnt > > > > nfs mount: mount: /mnt: Not owner > > > > foobar-root /) mount -o vers=3D3 seki.nac.uci.edu:/sdb1 /mnt > > > > foobar-root /) > > >=20 > > > Yes. interop works fine. > >=20 > > Cool! > >=20 > > Unfortunately though, I don't know the first thing about setting up > > NFSv4. I gather on the Solaris side, an NFSv4 domain is needed, and > > Solaris has a "take a guess at a good NFSv4 domain name" option. >=20 > For the Linux side, look through the documentation at >=20 > http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/ >=20 > and then let us know if you're still having problems. Corrections to > the documentation are also welcomed.--b. Does that doc require kerberos? How hard would it be to set up one of the following on FC3 and Solaris 10? LIPKEY (based on SPKM-3) SPKM-3 If we just continue using AUTH_UNIX with NFSv4, are we still relying on reserved ports? Thanks! --=-i0ZGxBw9q0t2wuLhlIkP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCH7/Do0feVm00f/8RApXUAJ0XPQl/ZtOYYhEC550uUEpfhhmYawCfY/C7 AwnMlP1AQDw5zvWpzatqsqw= =a48P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-i0ZGxBw9q0t2wuLhlIkP-- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs