From: Chris Penney Subject: SMP, NFS, and 2.6 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:58:02 -0500 Message-ID: <111aefd050329125848955802@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: penney@msu.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DGNmr-0005G8-OT for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:58:09 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.200]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1DGNmq-0007Cf-CU for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:58:09 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so648664wra for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:58:02 -0800 (PST) To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: I've heard from some (via google searchs) that there are issues with NFS + SMP when using the 2.6 kernel. Assuming I'm using 2.6.11.5 w/ the NFS-ALL patches applied should I be concerned about running SMP (dual cpu pentium 4 doing pretty much only NFSv3 TCP, but looking toward NFSv4)? Assuming it's ok to use SMP on a heavy use NFS server, should I enable or disable hyperthreading? I'd assume that for NFS hyperthreading would be good, but that's only a guess. Thanks, Chris ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs