From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: NFS FAQ updates Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:09:30 -0500 Message-ID: <20050314180930.GD27626@fieldses.org> References: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C611308539875@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Trond Myklebust , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DAu02-0000MF-OI for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:09:06 -0800 Received: from dsl093-002-214.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.2.214] helo=pickle.fieldses.org) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1DAu01-00068g-Af for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:09:06 -0800 To: "Lever, Charles" In-Reply-To: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C611308539875@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:48:05AM -0800, Lever, Charles wrote: > thanks for your comments, guys. i've simplified C7 a bit, see if it > helps: > > http://nfs.sourceforge.net/index.cel.php#faq_c7 I found it a little difficult to understand what you meant by "files sensitive to access by root" on my first reading: "If you are still concerned about the minor security implications described above, export only whole file systems if the file system contains files sensitive to access by root (such as setuid binaries)." And I wouldn't downplay the security concern quite so much. How about just this?: "If you need to be certain that clients cannot access files outside the exported part of a filesystem, set up the partitions on your server so that you need only export whole filesystems." A related complaint: the world "filesystem" has a lot of different meanings. I'm not sure if I'd be able to tell from this answer exactly which boundaries I could count on being respected by nfsd with subtree checking turned off. I think "partition" would convey something more concrete to most administrators. Would it be inaccurate to replace "filesystem" by "partition" everywhere in this answer? --b. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs