From: mehta kiran Subject: RE: Client sees delay in io when nfs server starts after failover Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20050426141233.28304.qmail@web51607.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DQQnp-0000Zc-22 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:12:41 -0700 Received: from web51607.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.212]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.41) id 1DQQnn-0003Mg-HZ for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:12:40 -0700 To: "Lever, Charles" In-Reply-To: 6667 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Hi , But client displays message "nfs server not responding" even if following messages are given by rpcinfo. #rpcinfo -u 100003 program 100003 version 2 ready and waiting program 100003 version 3 ready and waiting program 100003 version 4 ready and waiting #rpcinfo -t 100003 program 100003 version 2 ready and waiting program 100003 version 3 ready and waiting program 100003 version 4 ready and waiting Should rpc calls over tcp respond if server is not available thanks, --kiran --- "Lever, Charles" wrote: > > I am using sles9 sp1 rc5 (2.6.5-7.139 kernel) > > NFS server is running on a machines. > > Client access server and does moderate amount > > of io on mounted filesystem. > > When nfs server switches to other machine , > > nfs client has to wait for 2-3 minutes so as > > to continue io on new nfs server. > > Sometimes client sees delay of 20-30 > > seconds only.Why is this difference seen in > > different runs/executions. > > > > Is this the expected behaviour ? > > i'm speculating, but i expect the delay is due to > the time it takes the > client TCP layer to reconnect to the new server > host. i notice when a > client loses a TCP connection to a server (even > without a failover) it > takes as long as 2-3 minutes to reconnect. it's on > my list of things to > look at improving. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs