From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: NAT & lockd Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:12:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1112973168.9974.18.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <111aefd050408062546161db8@mail.gmail.com> <1112967554.15565.58.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <111aefd050408070844511651@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DJvAL-0004Lu-9D for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:13:01 -0700 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1DJvAJ-0003pf-Jp for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:13:01 -0700 To: penney@msu.edu In-Reply-To: <111aefd050408070844511651@mail.gmail.com> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: fr den 08.04.2005 Klokka 10:08 (-0400) skreiv Chris Penney: > In this situation (behind NAT), what happens with the client? Will a > lock request fail or simply appear to always work? > The server will refuse to grant the lock if it fails to set up monitoring with the client, so you should be "safe". Cheers, Trond -- Trond Myklebust ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs