From: Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@edsons.demon.nl>
Subject: Re: Detectiong Network and umount / mount NFS
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:26:04 +0200
Message-ID: <4267639C.2090102@edsons.demon.nl>
References: <1114027379.4266b57354785@webmail.tusofona.com>  <4266C21D.9030305@RedHat.com>  <1114038052.4266df245e54e@webmail.tusofona.com> <1114042784.17214.11.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504211009380.3889@maggie.lkpg.cendio.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Cc: esqueleto@tusofona.com, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Return-path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net)
	by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1DOWw9-00087K-6o
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:21:25 -0700
Received: from smtpq2.home.nl ([213.51.128.197])
	by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1DOWw7-0005zE-NB
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:21:25 -0700
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_=C5strand?= <astrand@cendio.se>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504211009380.3889@maggie.lkpg.cendio.se>
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=nfs>

Peter =C5strand wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
>>> Why? There is no Network!! Why the NFS mantain the connection?=20
>>> Should the NFS
>>> umount the mount points?
>>>
>>
>> Umm... Perhaps because there is a general consensus among NFS develope=
rs
>> that throwing away people's data, and killing off their processes
>> without their consent might be a bad thing?
>
>
> The problem is that it's hard to get rid of the mount even if you=20
> want. There is no --force-I-really-want-this.

read up on lazy unmount



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime in=
fo,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs