From: Anton Starikov Subject: Re: NFS cache problem Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 03:27:47 +0200 Message-ID: <42952613.4020701@utwente.nl> References: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C611308539BA7@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Db7AZ-0000vv-6E for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 25 May 2005 18:28:19 -0700 Received: from netlx050.vf.utwente.nl ([192.87.17.19]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1Db7AX-00055t-IB for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 25 May 2005 18:28:19 -0700 To: "Lever, Charles" In-Reply-To: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C611308539BA7@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Lever, Charles wrote: > if you have a way of reproducing this condition, maybe you could capture > a network trace on the server while running your test case... "tcpdump > -s0 -w dumpfile" and post it on the web so we can take a look at what's > going on. OK, I'll do as soon as one of my users will reports problem. Anton. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: GoToMeeting - the easiest way to collaborate online with coworkers and clients while avoiding the high cost of travel and communications. There is no equipment to buy and you can meet as often as you want. Try it free.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7402&alloc_id=16135&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs