From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: NFS Performance issues Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:14:24 +1000 Message-ID: <17025.41664.754710.970555@cse.unsw.edu.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DVkUp-0005wS-Cv for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 10 May 2005 23:15:03 -0700 Received: from tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.edu.au ([129.94.242.59] ident=root) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1DVkUK-0002mB-Hr for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 10 May 2005 23:15:03 -0700 To: Jeff Block In-Reply-To: message from Jeff Block on Tuesday May 10 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Tuesday May 10, jblock@mrsc.ucsf.edu wrote: > > We've tried moving the journaling from RAID devices onto another internal > disk. This helped a little, but not much. > Are you using ext3? Have you tried the "data=journal" mount option. It speeds up NFS writes a lot. NeilBrown ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs