From: mehta kiran Subject: nfsd filesystem Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20050728103013.96091.qmail@web51603.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Dy5ef-0003wE-2a for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:30:21 -0700 Received: from web51603.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.208]) by mail.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1Dy5ed-0001eo-B5 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:30:21 -0700 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Hi , Man page for nfsd FS says that absence of nfsd FS will make nfs function as it worked on 2.4 kernel Does this mean that with 2.4 kernel transparent nfs server failover(along with exports) cannot be achieved.Or does it mean that there was mechanisn different than "nfs upcall to mountd" to generate handle for client thanks, kiran __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20 http://mail.yahoo.com=20 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO Septem= ber 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & Q= A Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs