From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Strange problem with ACL over NFS Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 00:51:56 +0200 Message-ID: <1120258316.8246.0.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <42C3DBDC.5050803@bio.ifi.lmu.de> <1120157929.8922.14.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <42C4DA08.8070202@bio.ifi.lmu.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: NFS NFS Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DoUMp-0002Sg-5y for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:52:15 -0700 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.41) id 1DoUMn-0005Ev-KL for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:52:15 -0700 To: Frank Steiner In-Reply-To: <42C4DA08.8070202@bio.ifi.lmu.de> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: fr den 01.07.2005 Klokka 07:52 (+0200) skreiv Frank Steiner: > So this looks more like a client bug to me, because it is not always > the first mount from the same server that does not have ACL, but the > first overall NFS mount. Like the client was not able to initialize > ACLs for NFS before the first mount is done... I won't buy that argument until I see a tcpdump to prove it ;-) Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs