From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Some code, and a question
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 10:55:52 -0400
Message-ID: <431EFF78.6000709@redhat.com>
References: <1126046397.3000.188.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu>	 <20050907010219.GA14233@sgi.com> <1126103821.16701.8.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Cc: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Dan Stromberg <strombrg@dcs.nac.uci.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1126103821.16701.8.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu>
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net

Dan Stromberg wrote:

>
>Here's the summary output from my script.  You may find it surprising.
>It may have bugs, but so far it seems to be coming up with results that
>one might not expect.  This was iterating rsize's and wsize's from 4K to
>64K in steps of 1K.  BTW, this is from an AIX 5.1 host to a Solaris 9
>host, but the script should run on nearly any unix or linux:
>

Presumably you have made the configuration changes at least on the Solaris
side, /etc/system or some such, to allow these systems to go all the way to
a 64K transfer size?  Vanilla Solaris 9 won't do that.

What have you done to factor out the file system on the server?

    Thanx...

       ps


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs