From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: NFS problem - close to open cache consistency broken ? Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:08:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20050915150824.GA24870@fieldses.org> References: <044B81DE141D7443BCE91E8F44B3C1E288E451@exsvl02.hq.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Thomas Stockheim , Peter Staubach , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EFvLu-0006ht-5o for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:08:42 -0700 Received: from dsl093-002-214.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.2.214] helo=pickle.fieldses.org) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1EFvLp-0005LD-PM for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:08:42 -0700 To: "Lever, Charles" In-Reply-To: <044B81DE141D7443BCE91E8F44B3C1E288E451@exsvl02.hq.netapp.com> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:50:49AM -0700, Lever, Charles wrote: > close-to-open is a convention, not a specification, so it's really up to > the client developers to implement what they think is right. You can't turn off cache revalidation checks while someone else on the client has the file open. Wouldn't that would make close-to-open useless in a lot of cases? --b. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs