From: Peter Staubach Subject: Re: [PATCH kNFSd 001 of 4] fix setattr-on-symlink error return Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:46:09 -0400 Message-ID: <43500B01.1060303@redhat.com> References: <20051014122041.11376.patches@notabene> <1051014022307.11542@cse.unsw.edu.au> <434FA4C4.6010806@redhat.com> <434FFBE4.2C502E98@sgi.com> <4350087B.9070908@redhat.com> <43500A41.B356C556@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: NeilBrown , Andrew Morton , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EQVVQ-00040D-S7 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:46:16 -0700 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1EQVVQ-0005qh-ME for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:46:17 -0700 To: James Yarbrough In-Reply-To: <43500A41.B356C556@sgi.com> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: James Yarbrough wrote: >I thought we were talking about Spec SFS. >I could be confused, though. > I assumed that "SpecFS" was something different than "SPEC SFS". I know that I am confused. :-) ps ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs