From: James Yarbrough Subject: Re: [PATCH kNFSd 001 of 4] fix setattr-on-symlink error return Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:54:30 -0700 Message-ID: <43500CF6.4F0E67D3@sgi.com> References: <20051014122041.11376.patches@notabene> <1051014022307.11542@cse.unsw.edu.au> <434FA4C4.6010806@redhat.com> <434FFBE4.2C502E98@sgi.com> <4350087B.9070908@redhat.com> <43500A41.B356C556@sgi.com> <43500B01.1060303@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: NeilBrown , Andrew Morton , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EQVdW-0004Kb-GF for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:54:38 -0700 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19] helo=omx2.sgi.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EQVdW-00081E-DL for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:54:38 -0700 To: Peter Staubach Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Peter Staubach wrote: > > I assumed that "SpecFS" was something different than "SPEC SFS". I know > that I am confused. :-) > I thought it was just a typo. It seems that King Crimson was correct: "Confusion will be my epitaph" -- jmy@sgi.com 650 933 3124 Let's get ta jigglin'! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs