From: Vincent Roqueta Subject: Re: Authenticated NFS mounts Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:44:37 +0200 Message-ID: <200510181344.37509.vincent.roqueta@ext.bull.net> References: <200510181313.09401.vincent.roqueta@ext.bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1ERpqv-0005Xm-Vu for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:41:57 -0700 Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1ERpqs-0007DO-LD for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:41:58 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ecfrec.frec.bull.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B1219D90D for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:41:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ecfrec.frec.bull.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02583-01 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:41:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ecn002.frec.bull.fr (ecn002.frec.bull.fr [129.183.4.6]) by ecfrec.frec.bull.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A3F19D90A for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:41:10 +0200 (CEST) To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Le mardi 18 Octobre 2005 13:29, Sven Geggus a =E9crit=A0: > Vincent Roqueta wrote: > >> Is ist possible to use RPCSEC GSSAPI in conjunction with NFSv3 on Linux > >> Clients and Servers? > > > > Yes, that is possible. > > Any kind of mini HOWTO on this? Which Versions of mount, nfs-utils etc > would I need? That is the same howto as for NFSv4. You need a recent kernel. http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/index.php/Main_Page > Protection against mounts from untrusted machines which are not > authenticated is all I need to provide at the Moment. Ok. > NFSv4 seems to be a better design, but stability is more important for my > application. NFSv4 works quite fine for most NFSv3 uses. It pass some stress tests NFSv3= =20 does not. We are looking for early adpoters of NFSv4.=20 You should have a look here for tests :=20 http://nfsv4.bullopensource.org/ Vincent ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs