From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: OT: RAID perf doldrums: advice/recommendations? Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:34:47 +1000 Message-ID: <17249.40023.950260.948987@cse.unsw.edu.au> References: <20051028032149.14201.qmail@web51905.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EVL17-0005oT-Np for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:34:57 -0700 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx2.suse.de) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1EVL17-0006hd-Ed for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:34:57 -0700 To: email builder In-Reply-To: message from email builder on Thursday October 27 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Thursday October 27, emailbuilder88@yahoo.com wrote: > Hello, > > Recently we turned on a RAID-backed NFS server that fell flat on its face > as soon as it started to see even moderate activity (particularly IMAP > traffic from Courier-IMAP). Through help on the Courier mailing list, the > problem appears to be very poor throughput to our hard drives (although > systems is not my strong point, so I hope there is not something else I've > overlooked). > > Our choice to go with consumer-grade hardware seems to have bit us hard. > We are using the oft-maligned 3Ware 85xx series RAID5 controller and three > Hitachi Deskstar 7k250 (250GB) SATA drives. The NFS serves up the mailstore > for a system that does about 60 mail messages/min, plus IMAP against the > mailstore (which is what brings the hurt), and some moderately (much more > than Joe Bob's homepage, but not Slashdot) trafficed web content. We were > able to buy some time by moving our (ext3) journal off of the same device, > fiddle with a couple NFS settings (nodiratime,noatime), but it is still > woefully slow. mounting the ext3 partition with 'data=journal' can help NFS service, especially with the journal on a separate device. > > We are also quite curious about just running with software raid instead, > since there seems to be a growing movement that claims there is no reason it > cannot be as (or more) reliable and fast -- especially compared to the piece > of $@^!% that we apparently got. :) Certainly worth a try. It may not be as fast as some high-end raid cards, it is unlikely to be slower than what you have. NeilBrown ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs