From: "Lever, Charles" Subject: NLM GRANT callback using AUTH_NULL is rejected Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:38:22 -0800 Message-ID: <044B81DE141D7443BCE91E8F44B3C1E2013327B6@exsvl02.hq.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: "Olaf Kirch" , Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EclqP-0004gF-Hm for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:38:37 -0800 Received: from mx1.netapp.com ([216.240.18.38]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EclqN-0006Hi-80 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:38:37 -0800 To: Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: hi neil- it looks like you have the most expertise in this area, so you are the lucky victim today. our filer sends NLM GRANTED callbacks back to clients using AUTH_NULL authentication. Linux clients always seem to reject these callbacks. parsing through fs/lockd and net/sunrpc, i see a comment that indicates that AUTH_NULL RPC requests are subject to IP access control (a la /etc/exports). theoretically, if lockd doesn't register the filer in the ip_map cache, then all the filer's callbacks will be rejected, right? - Chuck Lever -- corporate: personal: ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs