From: Ryan Richter Subject: Re: NFS oops on 2.6.14.2 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:54:35 -0500 Message-ID: <20051129215435.GA6483@tau.solarneutrino.net> References: <20051129200013.GB6326@tau.solarneutrino.net> <1133299597.17363.2.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: <1133299597.17363.2.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:26:37PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Both presumably following a server reboot? > > Do you have any sure-fire way to reproduce it? Correct. The server crashed and rebooted this morning but I didn't see anything like this (these happened a few days ago after another mysterious server reboot). I'll be rebooting the server again tonight, so we'll see. So no, I don't yet have a sure-fire way to reproduce. > > These machines have an NFS-mounted root, but this is mounted nolock so I'm > > assuming that's unrelated. The other NFS mounts have options like: > > > > rw,nosuid,nodev,v3,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,intr,udp,lock > > > > I've also been seeing lots of the "do_vfs_lock: VFS is out of sync with lock > > manager!", but that has been happening at least since 2.6.13. > > That is usually the result of doing kill -9/kill -TERM/kill -INT on a > process that was in the act of grabbing a lock. OK, well it doesn't seem to cause any problems so I guess I'll ignore it. Just wanted to mention it since it sounds kind of ominous. Thanks, -ryan