From: email builder Subject: Re: OT: RAID perf doldrums: advice/recommendations? Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:55:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20051109205522.54312.qmail@web51905.mail.yahoo.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EZwyh-00088L-7q for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:55:31 -0800 Received: from web51905.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.48.68]) by mail.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EZwyg-00058H-2Y for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:55:31 -0800 To: mhaverkamp@kcp.com, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: > > > If you stay with RAID5, get something with a battery backed write=20 > cache.=20 > > > That will make a huge difference in RAID5 performance. > >=20 > > Really? I was under the impression that this was just a safety=20 > precaution or > > similar... it is called a "backup" after all. :) How exactly does i= t > > increase performance?=20 >=20 > Without one, writes must be flushed to disk before the RAID controller = can=20 > report them as complete. This includes even trivial things like updati= ng=20 > file access times. With one, writes only need to get into the=20 > controller's write cache before they are reported as complete. This=20 > allows the controller to schedule the actual write to disk at an optima= l=20 > time. Thank you sincerely for this excellent explanation. We are currently loo= king at the new 3Ware SATA II card, the 9550SX: http://3ware.com/products/serial_ata2-9000.asp What is strange about these is that the battery backup is sold separately= .=20 Does anyone have experience with the BBUs (battery backup units) on the 3= Ware 9000 series cards? - Do they really provide the bang for the extra $100? - What kind of configuration/installation mess are the BBUs? > A good way to show this is to untar a tar file full of small files (e.g= .=20 > kernel source). On RAID5 without write cache, this takes at least 10=20 > times longer than even a single ATA disk. >=20 > >=20 > > (And, yes, I have seen this mentioned in many places, so this would b= e a > > criteria for our next purchase. :) ) =09 __________________________________=20 Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downl= oad it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs