From: Dan Stromberg Subject: Re: NFS TCP settings Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:02:21 -0800 Message-ID: <1135191742.1122.402.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu> References: <20051221163254.70779.qmail@web34105.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Trond Myklebust , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, strombrg@dcs.nac.uci.edu Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Ep9EZ-0004eB-2k for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:02:43 -0800 Received: from dcs.nac.uci.edu ([128.200.34.32]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1Ep9EY-00008m-Tx for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:02:43 -0800 To: Kenny Simpson In-Reply-To: <20051221163254.70779.qmail@web34105.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 08:32 -0800, Kenny Simpson wrote: > --- Trond Myklebust wrote: > > The NFS/RPC code has no direct control over the TCP window size. That > > would be an issue for the networking people. > > I have tracked this a bit further, and am reporting back for completeness.. > > The version of OnTap we are using (6.4.1p1) does not seem to support RFC 1323 (large TCP windows), > but the Linux client does. The window scaling is communicated in the initial connection (SYN), so > if ethereal does not catch that, it will incorrectly report the window size as the unscaled number > - making the Linux client appear to be using a very small window. > The reason it appeared that the small window size was being honored is a result of the direct > crossover cable making the BDP (bandwidth-delay product) very small. > > As for the server side, because large TCP windows are not supported, the best it can do is 64k - > which it does. Running with GbE and jumbo packets fills the window quite fast obviating the need > for RFC 1323. > > Thanks to those who took the time to swing a clue stick in my direction. Speaking of TCP Window Scaling... :) I have some connection between some pairs of hosts for which all of the following appear to be true: 1) TCP Window Scaling is enabled on both endpoints 2) TCP Window Scaling is mentioned in the initial SYN and SYN/ACK 3) tcptrace thinks that TCP Window Scaling isn't happening Is there something other than the SYN and SYN/ACK that might cause TCP Window Scaling to go away? (Other than SACK that is - we have that enabled - at least according to tcptrace) Thanks! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs