From: Vincent Roqueta Subject: Re: performance problem on nfs in kernel v2.4 and v2.6 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:29:22 +0100 Message-ID: <200512151029.22818.vincent.roqueta@ext.bull.net> References: <20051215091751.7DE11FB046@gatekeeper.ncic.ac.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: "=?utf-8?q?=E9=99=88=E6=AC=A2?=" , Jerome Warnier Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EmpO5-0008Ub-NB for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:26:57 -0800 Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EmpO0-00032S-NR for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:26:55 -0800 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20051215091751.7DE11FB046@gatekeeper.ncic.ac.cn> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Le Jeudi 15 D=C3=A9cembre 2005 10:16, =E9=99=88=E6=AC=A2 a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > Jerome Warnier,=E6=82=A8=E5=A5=BD=EF=BC=81 > > yes, I did have do that . > in case 2.6.11, I tried rsize,wsize=3D8192/16384/32768, however, the res= ults > were bad. Could you give me local filesystem performances of the server? Vincent ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs