From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@duke.edu>
Subject: Re: Error 512
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:22:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512151521140.5180@chaos.egr.duke.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512141521150.5180@chaos.egr.duke.edu>
 <1134601986.13707.12.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512142052290.6445@chaos.egr.duke.edu>
 <1134612343.13707.20.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512151405060.5180@chaos.egr.duke.edu>
 <1134675422.7956.12.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>  <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512151439420.5180@chaos.egr.duke.edu>
 <1134677100.7956.19.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Return-path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net)
	by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1EmzcS-00043q-SW
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:22:28 -0800
Received: from chaos.egr.duke.edu ([152.3.195.82])
	by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.44)
	id 1EmzcS-0001oR-H7
	for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:22:28 -0800
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <1134677100.7956.19.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=nfs>

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 at 3:04pm, Trond Myklebust wrote

> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 14:40 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
>> Actually, that was on the client.  Would it be helpful to look at it from
>> the server side?
>
> Not yet...
>
> Something else interesting about that trace is the fact that the server
> keeps resending a bunch of old ACKs. It looks as if it thinks it is
> still connected to the client.
>
> What versions of Linux are you running on these machines?

Everything is fully up-to-date centos-4 (kernel 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp).

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs