From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: NFS performance tuning Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:22:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1136751734.7849.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <43BE9EC3.3090108@totalflood.com> <32f0438a5087c2ea289922bbacb1897d@local> <06259ef940d5d01fc15319edce982acc@local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Ian Kent , Stephen Carville , NFS List Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Evh3o-0002Lb-9P for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:22:40 -0800 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1Evh3l-0001zb-RJ for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:22:40 -0800 To: Blake Golliher In-Reply-To: <06259ef940d5d01fc15319edce982acc@local> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 23:44 -0800, Blake Golliher wrote: > The linux nfs client supports, at least, a 64k block transfer size. I > don't believe it's constrained by transport protocol. That is a very recent feature, though. Unless you are using the NFS_ALL patches, you will only get 64k block transfer sizes on the very latest GIT tarball. ;-) Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs