From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: NFS mount in a changing network Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:23:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1140031426.7888.28.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> References: <200602151716.18601.strieder@informatik.uni-kl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1F9SGC-0000FY-5S for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:24:20 -0800 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1F9SG6-0003Dm-Gs for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:24:20 -0800 To: Bernd Strieder In-Reply-To: <200602151716.18601.strieder@informatik.uni-kl.de> Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 17:16 +0100, Bernd Strieder wrote: > Attaching gdb to the process and setting a breakpoint on printf, > after calling ferror returning 1, it is clear that printf does not > output anything. errno has the value 116 ESTALE. > > How can this happen, an existing file gets into deleted status on > the client, without anybody having issued an unlink or whatever? > Or do stale filehandles finally result in deleted? See http://nfs.sourceforge.net/#faq_a10 Cheers, Trond ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs