From: "Shankar Anand" <shanand@novell.com>
Subject: nfsstat for NFSv4
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:14:19 -0600
Message-ID: <445F9F92.AD69.00CC.0@novell.com>
References: <4452537B.AD69.00CC.0@novell.com> <445B8B54.AD69.00CC.0@novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: , nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, gam3@gam3.net,
	G.AllenMorrisIII@linux-nfs.org,
	Charles Lever <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>
Return-path: <nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org>
To: <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>,
	<mailto:nfsv4-request@linux-nfs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@linux-nfs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@linux-nfs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>,
	<mailto:nfsv4-request@linux-nfs.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org
Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org
List-ID: <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>

Hi,

I have added some code for NFSv4 server statistics for individual NFSv4
operations. I will submitting that to the NFS community soon.

I have some questions:
1. I noticed in Allen's patch for nfsstat for NFSv4 statistics that he
has taken into account only 32 NFSv4 operations. Do you have any reasons
for leaving out the other operations (like PUTFH, SECINFO, SAVEFH)? 

2. I understand that in NFSv3 server we write the statistics into
/proc/net/rpc/nfsd in the same order as the RPC procedure numbers. Using
the same logic, I have written the NFSv4 statistics to be logged into
/proc/net/rpc/nfsd in the same order in which the operations are listed
in the NFSv4 RFC. But the NFSv4 client statistics that are getting
printed in Allen's patch seem to be of a different order. Why was this
decided to be so?

Thanks,
Shankar