From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [NFS] [RFC] NLM lock failover admin interface
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:36:05 +0100
Message-ID: <20060614113605.GA28158@infradead.org>
References: <1150089943.26019.18.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<17550.11870.186706.36949@cse.unsw.edu.au>
	<1150268091.28264.75.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-cluster@redhat.com
Return-path: <linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com>
To: Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1150268091.28264.75.camel@localhost.localdomain>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster>,
	<mailto:linux-cluster-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-cluster@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-cluster-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster>,
	<mailto:linux-cluster-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com
List-ID: <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>

On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:54:51AM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> KABI (kernel application binary interface) commitment is a big thing
> from our end - so I would like to focus more on the interface agreement
> before jumping into coding and implementation details. 

Please stop this crap now.  If zou don't get that there is no kernel internal
ABI and there never will be get a different job ASAP.