From: Greg Banks Subject: Re: 2.4 vs 2.6 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:17:04 +1000 Message-ID: <1150341424.22282.3076.camel@hole.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <17526.44653.228663.713864@cse.unsw.edu.au> <20060526081905.73641.qmail@web51609.mail.yahoo.com> <20060526193118.GB17761@fieldses.org> <17530.36039.227704.325645@cse.unsw.edu.au> <20060529160236.GC6832@fieldses.org> <20060530011208.GB12818@sgi.com> <20060530015918.GA27940@fieldses.org> <17550.12582.742528.454837@cse.unsw.edu.au> <20060613204225.GB26315@fieldses.org> <1150248571.22282.1450.camel@hole.melbourne.sgi.com> <20060614194021.BA8C51BDDE@citi.umich.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: mehta kiran , Vijay Chauhan , Neil Brown , Linux NFS Mailing List , "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FqiMF-0000UA-4P for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:17:23 -0700 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19] helo=omx2.sgi.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1FqiME-0005o8-3b for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:17:23 -0700 To: "William A.(Andy) Adamson" In-Reply-To: <20060614194021.BA8C51BDDE@citi.umich.edu> List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 05:40, William A.(Andy) Adamson wrote: > funny you should mention the RPC upcall. that was the origional design i > coded, was working just fine, and was nixed! Whyever? Greg. -- Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. I don't speak for SGI. _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs